From 30589be58b8a1e7e6832045aed98a230a58c1dc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:31:43 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added C++ guard. I don't know, why we define the <wctype.h>
 protos both there and in <wchar.h>. Any reason for not removing them in
 <wctype.h>? Or maybe even nicer reverse the inclusion direction, i.e. remove
 the duplicate protos in <wchar.h> and include <wctype.h> instead.

git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@20317 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
---
 headers/posix/wchar.h | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/headers/posix/wchar.h b/headers/posix/wchar.h
index e3c9188944..404dc19f4e 100644
--- a/headers/posix/wchar.h
+++ b/headers/posix/wchar.h
@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ typedef struct {
 
 #include <size_t.h>
 
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+
 extern wint_t	fgetwc(FILE *);
 extern wchar_t	*fgetws(wchar_t *, int, FILE *);
 extern wint_t	fputwc(wchar_t, FILE *);
@@ -82,6 +86,10 @@ extern size_t	wcsxfrm(wchar_t *, const wchar_t *, size_t);
 extern wctype_t	wctype(const char *);
 extern int		wcwidth(wchar_t);
 
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+}
+#endif
+
 #define WEOF ((wint_t)(-1))
 
 #endif /* _WCHAR_H */