From 968997db5f4262f7cc6ce49ec889c8f9bfa78f4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tyler Dauwalder <tylerdauwalder@nowhere.fake>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 08:25:15 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] new(nothrow) is desired by SLList. My definition of nothrow
 is a bit sketchy here, but will work for now until I figure out the proper
 way to do it.

git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/trunk/current@3359 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
---
 src/add-ons/kernel/file_systems/udf/cpp.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/add-ons/kernel/file_systems/udf/cpp.h b/src/add-ons/kernel/file_systems/udf/cpp.h
index f0e8aaa709..efba021d4d 100644
--- a/src/add-ons/kernel/file_systems/udf/cpp.h
+++ b/src/add-ons/kernel/file_systems/udf/cpp.h
@@ -10,6 +10,14 @@
 #include <new>
 #include <stdlib.h>
 
+// I'm not entirely sure if this is such a great idea or not, but
+// I can't find the standard definition of nothrow anywhere (in
+// order to copy it properly here for kernel use), so this will
+// do for the moment so things compile and I can go to bed. :-)
+// ToDo: declare and define this thing properly
+#ifndef nothrow
+#	define nothrow 0
+#endif
 
 // Oh no! C++ in the kernel! Are you nuts?
 //
@@ -29,6 +37,13 @@ operator new(size_t size)
 } 
 
 
+inline void *
+operator new(size_t size, const nothrow_t&) throw()
+{
+	return malloc(size);
+}
+
+
 inline void *
 operator new[](size_t size)
 {
@@ -36,6 +51,13 @@ operator new[](size_t size)
 }
  
 
+inline void *
+operator new[](size_t size, const nothrow_t&) throw()
+{
+	return malloc(size);
+}
+
+
 inline void
 operator delete(void *ptr)
 {