From 9b7978ffe603eb62b31660d714070f3c9972a29d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Ceccherini <stefano.ceccherini@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:08:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] No need to Lock()/Unlock() as Flush() does it already. Sync()
 wouldn't have unlocked the window in case FlushWithReply() wouldn't succeed.

git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@13061 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
---
 src/kits/interface/Window.cpp | 7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/kits/interface/Window.cpp b/src/kits/interface/Window.cpp
index cc3decb8c7..812306a08c 100644
--- a/src/kits/interface/Window.cpp
+++ b/src/kits/interface/Window.cpp
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ BWindow::Sync() const
 
 	// ToDo: why with reply?
 	int32 code;
-	if (fLink->FlushWithReply(code) == B_OK)
+	fLink->FlushWithReply(code);
 
 	const_cast<BWindow*>(this)->Unlock();
 }
@@ -793,10 +793,7 @@ BWindow::DispatchMessage(BMessage *msg, BHandler *target)
 		case B_PULSE:
 			if (fPulseEnabled) {
 				sendPulse(top_view);
-				if (Lock()) {
-					Flush();
-					Unlock();
-				}
+				Flush();
 			}
 			break;