* Turns out the assert was wrong; since the previous buffer can be adjacent to
the next buffer, it can also cause the new buffer to start at the same sequence as the next buffer. git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/haiku/trunk@28958 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
This commit is contained in:
@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ BufferQueue::Add(net_buffer *buffer, tcp_sequence sequence)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// "next" always starts after the buffer sequence
|
||||
ASSERT(next == NULL || buffer == NULL || next->sequence > sequence);
|
||||
// "next" always starts at or after the buffer sequence
|
||||
ASSERT(next == NULL || buffer == NULL || next->sequence >= sequence);
|
||||
|
||||
while (buffer != NULL && next != NULL
|
||||
&& tcp_sequence(sequence + buffer->size) > next->sequence) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user